The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2284•United Hebrew Congregation of St. Louis v. Selective Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey Corporation
21-2284Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 29, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-2752
___________________________
United Hebrew Congregation of St. Louis
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Selective Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: March 22, 2022
Filed: April 5, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, LOKEN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri synagogue United Hebrew Congregation of St. Louis appeals the
district court’s1 dismissal of its diversity action raising claims under Missouri state
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
law based on Selective Insurance Company of America’s denial of coverage for lost
business income caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Following a careful review, we
conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing the case, see Plymouth Cty.
v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review), as United
Hebrew’s argument that its pandemic-related closure constituted a direct physical loss
of property is foreclosed by our prior precedent, see Oral Surgeons, PC v. Cincinnati
Insurance Co., 2 F.4th 1141, 1144 (8th Cir. 2021) (direct physical loss requires some
physicality to the loss or damage of property, such as physical alteration, physical
contamination, or physical destruction; mere loss of use without physical loss or
damage does not suffice). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.