The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1526•United States of America v. Christopher Williams
20-1526Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2235
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Christopher Williams
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: May 6, 2022
Filed: May 13, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, Chief Judge, BENTON and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Christopher R. Williams pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to possessing
a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The
district court sentenced him to 190 months in prison pursuant to the Armed Career
Criminal Act (ACCA). He appealed, among other things, the ACCA sentence,
arguing he did not have at least three prior convictions for a serious drug offense,
which were committed on different occasions. This court affirmed the ACCA
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
sentence. See United States v. Williams, 976 F.3d 781, 787 (8th Cir. 2020).
Williams sought certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court
vacated the judgment of this court and remanded “for further consideration in light
of Wooden v. United States.” Williams v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1439, 1439
(2022), citing Wooden v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1063 (2022) (holding that the
defendant’s prior convictions for burglary were not offenses committed on different
occasions within the meaning of the ACCA). Considering Wooden v. United States,
this court remands to the district court for a new factual determination on the issue
of whether Williams had three prior convictions committed on different occasions.
* * * * * * * *
The judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case remanded for
further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.