Glen R. Edwards, Inc.; Daniel A. Narup DMD, LLC v. Travelers Casualty Insurance; The Phoenix Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-3035
___________________________
Glen R. Edwards, Inc.; Daniel A. Narup DMD, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Travelers Casualty Insurance; The Phoenix Insurance Company
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: May 6, 2022
Filed: May 13, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri dental practices Glen R. Edwards, Inc. and Daniel A. Narup DMD,
LLC appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their diversity breach-of-contract action
1The Honorable Matthew T. Schelp, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

against Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America and The Phoenix
Insurance Company, in which they sought payment of their business-income and
extra-expense claims arising from the near-total shutdown of their offices due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Upon careful de novo review, see Oral Surgeons, P.C. v.
Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2 F.4th 1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review), we find
that dismissal was proper, as the dental practices’ argument that the loss of use of
their offices constituted “direct physical loss of or damage to” their property is
foreclosed by our prior precedent. See Monday Rests. v. Intrepid Ins. Co., No. 21-
2462, 2022 WL 1194000 (8th Cir. Apr. 26, 2022) (finding no meaningful distinction
between “loss of” and “damage to” property in insurance policy, and affirming
dismissal because plaintiff alleged no physical loss to dental office limited to
emergency operations during pandemic); Oral Surgeons, 2 F.4th at 1144 (policy
requiring direct “physical loss” or “physical damage” to trigger business interruption
and extra expense coverage required some physicality to loss or damage of property,
e.g., physical alteration, contamination, or destruction).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --