The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1736•Nigeria Lee Harvey v. Minnesota Department of Correction
21-1736Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1192
___________________________
Nigeria Lee Harvey,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Minnesota Department of Correction; Paul Schnell, Commissioner; Michelle
Smith, Deputy Commissioner; Guy Bosch, Warden of the Minnesota Stillwater
Correctional Facility; Lisa Stenseth, Associate Warden of Administration; Victor
Wanchena, Associate Warden of Administration; Andrew Reed, Program Director;
Brianna Erickson, 2nd Watch Commander; Marisa Williams, 3rd Watch
Commander; Monica Arons, RN Supervisor; Lynn Noll, Health Services Director;
Nanette Larson, Director of Nursing; Tina Sneen, Director of Nursing; Centurion
of Minnesota, L.L.C.,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: May 17, 2022
Filed: June 6, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Nigeria Harvey appeals a decision of the district court1
dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. Upon careful review, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See 42
U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003). Specifically,
Harvey failed to comply with the Minnesota Department of Corrections grievance
procedure by sending a letter directly to its Central Office without first sending a kite
to the appropriate staff person at the prison and filing a formal grievance with the
facility’s grievance coordinator. See Burns v. Eaton, 752 F.3d 1136, 1141 (8th Cir.
2014). He also did not show that his administrative remedies were unavailable. See
Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1859-60 (2016); Gibson v. Weber, 431 F.3d 339, 341
(8th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
John F. Docherty, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.