United States of America v. Darius Antwone Sims

21-1707Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 29, 2022

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-2230
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Darius Antwone Sims
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: April 13, 2022
Filed: July 22, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
The district court1 enhanced Darius Sims’s sentence for “maintain[ing] a
premises for the purpose of manufacturing or distributing a controlled substance.”
1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, then Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa, now retired.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
U.S.S.G § 2D1.1(b)(12). Although he argues that the enhancement does not apply,
we affirm.
There was no error, procedural or otherwise, because the evidence supported
the enhancement. See United States v. Miller, 698 F.3d 699, 705 (8th Cir. 2012)
(reviewing this finding for clear error). Sims stored large amounts of
methamphetamine in his backyard and “distributed [it] from the residence.” Officers
also found drug-related items too, including a gun inside and a digital scale located
near the stash of methamphetamine outside. On these facts, the district court did not
clearly err in finding that distributing drugs was a “primary or principal use[] for the
premises,” id. at 706 (quoting U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 cmt. n.17) (involving similar facts),
“even if the premises also served other, legitimate functions,” United States v.
Anwar, 880 F.3d 958, 971 (8th Cir. 2018) (quotation marks omitted).
We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.