The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1611•United States of America v. Jalon Moore
22-1611Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1899
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jalon Moore
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: September 16, 2022
Filed: September 21, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jalon Moore appeals after he pleaded guilty in the district court1 to five counts
of Hobbs Act robbery and two counts of possessing or brandishing a firearm in
1The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
furtherance of a crime of violence, pursuant to a plea agreement that included an
appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the firearm convictions should be
vacated. Moore filed a pro se brief seeking to challenge the robbery convictions.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,
and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d
702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.
2003) (en banc). Though the Supreme Court recently held that attempted Hobbs Act
robbery is not a crime of violence, United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015, 2020
(2022), the plea agreement established that Moore pleaded guilty to completed Hobbs
Act robbery, which is a crime of violence. Diaz v. United States, 863 F.3d 781, 783
(8th Cir. 2017).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope
of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and we
dismiss the appeal.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.