The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-3885•Dean Christiansen v. Christopher Eral
21-3885Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1865
___________________________
Rafael Antonio Segovia-Yanes
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: September 28, 2022
Filed: October 3, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Rafael Segovia-Yanes, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of his application
for cancellation of removal. Segovia argues that removing him would cause
“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to his American-citizen children. 8
U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). We will not consider this argument because Segovia
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
failed to raise it before the Board. See Bakor v. Barr, 958 F.3d 732, 739 (8th Cir.
2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2566 (2021); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (requiring
exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial review). We accordingly
dismiss the petition for review.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.