The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-3885•Lance Gerald Milliman v. Howell County, Missouri
21-3885Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-3388
___________________________
Lance Gerald Milliman
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Howell County, Missouri; Robert David Ray, Associate Circuit Court Judge, 37th
Judicial Circuit; Michael P. Hutchings, Prosecuting Attorney, Howell Co.,
Missouri; Bethany Hanson Turner, Public Defender, 37th Judicial District; Scott L.
Nelson, Patrol Trooper, Missouri State Highway Patrol; Levi Stoops, Commercial
Vehicle Inspector, Missouri Highway Patrol
Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: September 27, 2022
Filed: October 6, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Lance Gerald Milliman appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court
affirms.
This court has considered the parties’ arguments on appeal and concludes that
dismissal was appropriate because the claims were time-barred under any applicable
statute of limitations. See Humphrey v. Eureka Gardens Pub. Facility Bd., 891 F.3d
1079, 1081 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of dismissal of claim as time-barred);
Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review of
grant of motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); see also Mo. Rev. Stat.
§ 516.120 (5-year limitations period for personal injury actions); Wallace v. Kato,
549 U.S. 384, 388 (2007) (in § 1983 action, a court looks to the statute of limitations
that state law provides for personal-injury torts); Sulik v. Taney Cnty., Mo., 393 F.3d
765, 767 (8th Cir. 2005) (Missouri’s five-year statute of limitations for personal
injury actions applies in § 1983 claims); cf. Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 516.130 (3-year
limitations period for actions against public officers), 516.140 (2-year limitations
period for, inter alia, false imprisonment).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Milliman’s pending motion
for sanctions and other relief is denied as moot.
______________________________
1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.