United States of America v. Ali Fazil Ali

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2695
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Ali Fazil Ali,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: October 24, 2022
Filed: October 27, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ali Ali appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and
sentenced him to 6 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed
1The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the revocation
sentence.
We conclude that Ali’s sentence was not unreasonable, as there was no
indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight
to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th
Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th
Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014).
The revocation sentence and term of supervised release are within the statutory range,
see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), and the district court stated that
it had considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. White Face,
383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --