United States of America v. Jeffrey Colin Purdy

21-2551Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2022

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1289
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: November 2, 2022
Filed: November 7, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Purdy received a 60-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to
cyberstalking. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261(b)(5), 2261A(2). He raises a variety of
challenges to his conviction and sentence. Some center on whether he was the victim
of a conspiracy between investigators and prosecutors to cover up misconduct.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Others focus on whether the district court1 should have been more receptive to his
motions, including one asking to withdraw his guilty plea. In the end, none have
merit.
Of the issues we can consider on appeal, the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying Purdy’s numerous motions. See United States v. Andolini, 705
F.3d 335, 337 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam); United States v. Jones, 643 F.3d 275,
277 (8th Cir. 2011). Nor are the challenges to the restitution award or the
performance of counsel properly before us. See Manrique v. United States, 137
S. Ct. 1266, 1271 (2017) (holding that “[t]he requirement that a defendant file a
timely notice of appeal from an amended judgment imposing restitution is at least a
mandatory claim-processing rule”); United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d
824, 826–27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually best
litigated in collateral proceedings”). Having carefully reviewed these arguments and
others, we accordingly affirm the judgment, dismiss the challenge to the restitution
award, and deny the motion to strike the government’s brief.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.