The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2551•Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead, in their official
21-2551Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2484
___________________________
Kenneth Daywitt; Kenneth Parks; Nicholas Luhmann; Joseph Thomas; Ramone
Newell; Allen Pyron
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Jodi Harpstead, in their official and individual capacities; Nancy Johnston, in their
official and individual capacities; Kathryn Schesso, in their official and individual
capacities; Peter Puffer, in their official and individual capacities
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: November 14, 2022
Filed: November 17, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota civil detainees Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas
Luhmann, Joseph Thomas, Ramone Newell, and Allen Pyron appeal the district
-- 1 of 2 --
court’s1 dismissal of their pro se complaint for failure to state a claim. After careful
de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of
review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.