United States of America v. Kenneth Dean Becker

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1042
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kenneth Dean Becker
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: December 12, 2022
Filed: December 27, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Dean Becker entered a conditional guilty plea for conspiracy to
distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He reserved the

-- 1 of 2 --

right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress. We affirm the judgment of the
district court.1
Officers executed a search warrant at Becker’s residence. Becker argues there
was a lack of probable cause, officers violated procedural requirements under
Nebraska law, and statements he made after the arrest were fruits of a poisonous tree.
We review factual findings on the denial of motion to suppress for clear error and
legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Thurmond, 782 F.3d 1042, 1044 (8th Cir.
2015).
Probable cause for the search warrant existed. A cooperating witness told
police that drug activity was occurring at a residence in Omaha. Investigators
monitored a controlled buy between the cooperating witness and an individual at the
residence. The evidence from the monitoring of the controlled buy demonstrated “a
fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime” was in the residence. Id.
Although the affidavit did not specify the cooperating witness’s background, the buy
was recorded with video and audio making the credibility issue largely immaterial.
Next, even if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the
warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence. United States v. Howard, 532
F.3d 755, 760 (8th Cir. 2008) (the Fourth Amendment, not state law, determines the
admissibility of a search offered in a federal prosecution).2
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
2The pro se motion to amend the record is denied on the same grounds.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --