The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2743•United States of America v. Clyde Macks Stewart, Jr.
20-2743Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 30, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2596
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Clyde Macks Stewart, Jr.,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: December 12, 2022
Filed: December 15, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Clyde Stewart, Jr. appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after
Stewart pleaded guilty to offenses involving drugs and firearms. His counsel has
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.
We conclude that Stewart’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable. The
court imposed a sentence below the advisory guideline range, see United States v.
McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013), and there is no indication that the
district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or
irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant
factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en
banc).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.