Roderick G. Talley v. City of Little Rock, a municipality; Kenton Buckner, individually

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-2806
___________________________
Roderick G. Talley
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
City of Little Rock, a municipality; Kenton Buckner, individually, et al.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: January 23, 2023
Filed: January 26, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Roderick Talley appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Little Rock police officers
1The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

violated his constitutional rights in searching his apartment pursuant to an invalid no-
knock search warrant and the City is liable for this unconstitutional conduct.
Upon careful review, we agree with the district court that, even without false
statements in the warrant affidavit regarding what the officers personally observed
during an informant’s controlled drug buy, the affidavit provided sufficient probable
cause that drugs would be found in Talley’s residence based on what the informant
told the officers and other information the officers received that Talley was involved
in drug activity on the premises. Nor did the officers rely on a no-knock warrant that
“was based on an affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official
belief in its existence entirely unreasonable.” Kiesling v. Holladay, 859 F.3d 529,
533 (8th Cir. 2017) (quotation omitted). Because we conclude there was no
underlying constitutional violation, the City cannot be liable. See Furlow v. Belmar,
52 F.4th 393, 406 (8th Cir. 2022).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --