The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-4016•Shawn Clarke Spottswood v. Washington County, MN; Deputy Sarah Peulen
21-4016Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1818
___________________________
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Washington County, MN; Deputy Sarah Peulen
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: December 22, 2022
Filed: January 24, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRASZ, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Shawn Spottswood appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record
and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court properly
dismissed on initial review several defendants and Spottswood’s § 1983 claims
against Washington County. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000)
(reviewing de novo 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal). We also conclude
summary judgment was proper on his § 1983 claims against the remaining
defendants. See Wood v. Wooten, 986 F.3d 1079, 1080 (8th Cir. 2021) (reviewing de
novo grant of summary judgment). Finally, the district court did not abuse its
discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Spottswood’s state
claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (allowing district court to decline to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over claim after dismissing all original jurisdiction claims);
King v. City of Crestwood, 899 F.3d 643, 651 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Spottswood’s
motion for appointment of counsel, an extension of time, and for oral argument.
______________________________
1The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth
Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.