The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2057•United States of America v. John Rick Winer
22-2057Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1869
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
John Rick Winer
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Southern
____________
Submitted: February 6, 2023
Filed: February 9, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
John Rick Winer scammed investors out of millions of dollars. He asks us to
reverse his wire-fraud, money-laundering, and conspiracy convictions, 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1343, 1349, 1512(c)(2), (k), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), (h), but his arguments are
conclusory and discuss no legal authority. See Cox v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys.,
Inc., 685 F.3d 663, 674 (8th Cir. 2012) (declining to consider an argument when the
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
party “fail[ed] to provide a meaningful explanation . . . and citation to relevant
authority”); see also United States v. Hansen, 791 F.3d 863, 867 (8th Cir. 2015)
(explaining that an intent to defraud “can be shown by circumstantial evidence”
(quotation marks omitted)). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district
court.1
______________________________
1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.