The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2057•Brent A. Ristow v. Douglas R. Peterson
22-2057Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3029
___________________________
Brent A. Ristow
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Douglas R. Peterson; Thomas Henry Boyd; Juan G. Hoyos; John Michael Koneck;
Mark S. Kuppe; Shawne M. Monahan; Cheryl M. Prince; Pamela A. Thein;
Timothy Yuen Wong; Carol Martens; Erin C. Wacker; Natasha Karn; Karen
McGillic; Amanda Cunningham
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: February 6, 2023
Filed: February 15, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Brent Ristow appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se action, brought
under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, challenging the proceedings which culminated
in the denial of his admission to the Minnesota Bar. Upon careful de novo review,
see Chase v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P., 12 F.4th 864, 868 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard
of review), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district
court.
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.