United States of America v. Joseph Howard Yennie; Sheila Ann Yennie

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3557
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Joseph Howard Yennie; Sheila Ann Yennie
Defendants - Appellants
Nick J. Novak; Abraham Algadi; Paul Perry; Grant Friese; Jay Strande; Dean
Weis; Jayne Krause; Peoples State Bank of Plainview; City of Pine Island
Defendants
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: April 17, 2023
Filed: April 20, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Joseph and Sheila Yennie challenge the enforcement of a federal tax lien
against real property they own. See 26 U.S.C. § 7403(a). Having carefully reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that there are no
material facts in dispute and the government is entitled to judgment as a matter of
law.1 See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing a grant of
summary judgment de novo); Nelson v. Nelson, 183 N.W. 354, 355 (Minn. 1921)
(explaining that Minnesota follows the common-law “rule of separate property rights
of both husband and wife” and has not adopted “[t]he doctrine of community
property”). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.2 See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
1 We deny both pending motions.
2 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.

-- 2 of 2 --