United States of America v. Raymone Deshawn Walker, Sr.

22-1638Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2023

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-1223
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Raymone Deshawn Walker, Sr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: June 6, 2023
Filed: June 9, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Raymone Walker, Sr. appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release and sentenced him to 24 months in prison and 6 months of supervised release.
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the
sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in sentencing Walker, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or
committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors; and the sentence
was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory limit. See 18
U.S.C. § 3583 (maximum revocation prison term is 2 years for Class C felony;
maximum supervised release term is 3 years, less any previous and current revocation
prison terms); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009)
(substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential
abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733,
740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor
when sentencing defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of
relevant matters and some reason for court’s decision).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.