United States of America v. Jamil Barhoumi

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-1483
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Jamil Barhoumi,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: July 10, 2023
Filed: August 2, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jamil Barhoumi appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 12 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave to
withdraw and filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence.
1The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Barhoumi. There is no indication that the court gave
significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor or committed a clear error of
judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910,
914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923
(8th Cir. 2006); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004). The
revocation prison sentence was below the statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(3).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --