The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2921•United States of America v. Theo Walker
22-2921Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2128
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Theo Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas
____________
Submitted: September 29, 2023
Filed: October 4, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Theo Walker appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled
guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. His counsel has moved to withdraw
1The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion
in sentencing Walker. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.
2009) (en banc) (standard of review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d
754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming sentences reasonable if within United States
Sentencing Guidelines Manual range). Further, having independently reviewed the
record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.