The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1329•Vivian Houston; Johnnie L. Ball v. Christopher Klaverkamp; Scott Amos
23-1329Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2644
___________________________
Vivian Houston; Johnnie L. Ball
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Christopher Klaverkamp; Scott Amos
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: November 13, 2023
Filed: November 16, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Vivian Houston and Johnnie Ball appeal following the district court’s1 with-
prejudice dismissal of their civil rights action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
1The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
Procedure 41(b). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments
on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
dismissing the action for willful disobedience of court orders. See Smith v. Gold Dust
Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir. 2008). We likewise discern no abuse of
discretion in the denial of appellants’ post-judgment motions. See Akpovi v. Douglas,
43 F.4th 832, 837 (8th Cir. 2022); Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 506 F.3d 1111,
1117 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.