The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-2615•Eugene Hampton v. City of St. Louis
22-2615Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 28, 2023
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3017
___________________________
Eugene Hampton,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,
v.
City of St. Louis; St. Louis City Justice Center; Missouri State Public Defenders
Office; Neal Barron,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants,
Unknown Walker, Lieutenant,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee,
Unknown Briggs, Lieutenant,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant,
Shelby Nord,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee,
Disciplinary Committee Hearing Officer(s), St. Louis Justice Center,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
Submitted: December 7, 2023
Filed: December 13, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Hampton appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment
dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that correctional officers used
excessive force against him. Upon careful de novo review of the record, we find no
basis for reversal. See Myers v. Lutsen Mts. Corp., 587 F.3d 891, 892-93 (8th Cir.
2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.