Angela Braswell Armstrong v. Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, a Body Politic and Corporate

23-2589Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2024

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-3141
___________________________
Angela Braswell Armstrong
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, a Body Politic and Corporate
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: May 14, 2024
Filed: May 20, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Angela Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her action against the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas,
1The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

in which she alleged she was subjected to a hostile work environment and retaliated
against, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Upon careful review, we
conclude that Armstrong failed to present sufficient evidence to establish an
actionable hostile work environment claim. See Gilbert v. Des Moines Area Cmty.
College, 495 F.3d 906, 913 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review); see also Paskert v.
Kemna-Asa Auto Plaza, Inc., 950 F.3d 535, 538 (8th Cir. 2020). We also agree with
the district court that Armstrong failed to demonstrate that she was retaliated against
for filing a hostile work environment complaint. See Tyler v. Univ. of Ark. Bd. of
Trustees, 628 F.3d 980, 985 (8th Cir. 2011).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.