The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-2589•Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances Sales and Service
23-2589Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2024
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-3562
___________________________
Valerie Steiner
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
M & H Appliances Sales and Service
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: April 30, 2024
Filed: May 3, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Valerie Steiner, a former employee of M & H Appliances Sales and Service,
appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se
1The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on
appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v.
Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 770 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant
of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.