Harold David Yaritz v. Department of Corrections

23-2286Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 28, 2024

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2457
___________________________
Harold David Yaritz
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Department of Corrections; RC; Warden Guy Bosch, of the Stillwater Facility;
Victor Wanchena, Assistant Warden of Stillwater; Stephanie Huppert, Prior
Program Director Stillwater, now Assistant Warden Rush City; Ms. Westphal,
Assistant Warden Faribault; DOC Commissioner Paul Schnell; Deputy
Commissioner Michelle Smith
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 25, 2024
Filed: June 28, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Minnesota inmate Harold Yaritz appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful de novo review, we affirm. See Ingram
v. Ark. Dep’t of Corr., 91 F.4th 924, 927 (8th Cir. 2024) (standard of review). We
conclude that the district court did not err in construing Yaritz’s second amended
complaint as the sole operative pleading. See In re Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 209 F.3d
1064, 1067 (8th Cir. 2000) (amended complaint ordinarily supersedes original
complaint and renders it without legal effect). As this complaint did not articulate
specific claims, request specific relief, or allege sufficient facts to establish any
individual defendant’s personal involvement in the alleged violations, we find
dismissal was appropriate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (pleading that states claim for
relief must include short and plain statement of claim and demand for relief sought);
White v. Jackson, 865 F.3d 1064, 1081 (8th Cir. 2017) (42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim
requires plaintiff to show each individual defendant’s personal involvement in alleged
violation).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Yaritz’s pending
motion.
______________________________
1The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.