The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-3211•Justin E. Riddle v. Omaha Public Schools
23-3211Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 30, 2024
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1940
___________________________
Justin E. Riddle
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Omaha Public Schools
Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: August 23, 2024
Filed: August 28, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Justin Riddle appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1 The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on
appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Horras v. Am. Cap.
Strategies, Ltd., 729 F.3d 798, 801 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review). There is no
support in the record for Riddle’s claim of judicial bias. See Liteky v. United States,
510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a basis for
judicial bias).
The pending motions are denied and the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.