Aura Ramirez-Lopez v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1135
___________________________
Aura Ramirez-Lopez
Petitioner
v.
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Respondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: August 30, 2024
Filed: September 10, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Aura Ramirez-Lopez challenges the denial of her application for asylum and
withholding of removal. The evidence in the record does not show that she is eligible
for relief. See Lemus-Arita v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 476, 480, 482 (8th Cir. 2017)
(explaining the standard of review and what it takes to establish a well-founded fear
of future persecution). She has conceded her inability to show past persecution, and

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
substantial evidence supports the conclusion that she has no well-founded fear of
future persecution.1 See id. at 482. We accordingly deny the petition for review.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1 Given this conclusion, it is unnecessary to address any of the other arguments
she raises. See Cano v. Barr, 956 F.3d 1034, 1040 & n.4 (8th Cir. 2020); see also
Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (discussing waiver).

-- 2 of 2 --