The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1207•United States of America v. Tony Ray Waites
21-1207Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 25, 2024
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1316
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Tony Ray Waites
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri
____________
Submitted: September 17, 2024
Filed: September 24, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRASZ, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tony Waites appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled
guilty to child exploitation. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief
1The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of
the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion
in sentencing Waites. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.
2009) (en banc) (standard of review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d
754, 760-61 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming sentence reasonable if within United States
Sentencing Guidelines Manual range). Further, having independently reviewed the
record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.