The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-3035•Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese; Backyard Specialty Foods; Minnehaha Court Clerks Office, Civil
23-3035Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 27, 2024
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2065
___________________________
Courtney Richmond
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nolan Wiese; Backyard Specialty Foods; Minnehaha Court Clerks Office, Civil
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Southern
____________
Submitted: October 30, 2024
Filed: November 4, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Courtney Richmond appeals the district court’s1 dismissal for lack of
jurisdiction of his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we conclude that the
1The Honorable Roberto Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
-- 1 of 2 --
district court did not err in dismissing the case. See Laclede Gas Co. v. St. Charles
Cty., Mo., 713 F.3d 413, 417 (8th Cir. 2013) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction). Accordingly, we grant Richmond’s pending motion to
file an amended brief, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.