The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-3231•United States of America v. Blake M. Knievel
23-3231Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2025
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3357
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Blake M. Knievel
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: February 11, 2025
Filed: February 14, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Blake Knievel appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Upon careful review, we conclude that
1The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska.
-- 1 of 2 --
the court did not err in finding that Knievel failed to establish extraordinary and
compelling reasons warranting a sentence reduction. See United States v. Marcussen,
15 F.4th 855, 858 (8th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.