The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1365•Susan Chanell Ross v. Dr. Menaka Chandra
23-1365Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2025
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3099
___________________________
Susan Chanell Ross
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dr. Menaka Chandra
Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: March 11, 2025
Filed: March 14, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Susan Ross appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se
complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1 The Honorable Matthew T. Schelp, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
After careful review, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Mo. Rev. Stat.
§ 538.225 (affidavit required in action against health care provider for damages on
account of rendering or failure to render health care services; court shall dismiss
action if plaintiff fails to file affidavit); Mathison v. United States, 44 Fed. Appx. 27,
29 (8th Cir. 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (failure to comply with affidavit
requirement excusable only where defendant’s liability can be established without
expert testimony; plaintiff’s claims of dental malpractice required expert affidavit).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.