The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1365•United States of America v. Dale Martin, Jr.
23-1365Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2025
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3183
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dale Martin, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota
____________
Submitted: March 5, 2025
Filed: March 21, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dale Martin, Jr. appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to a prison term of 12 months and one day, with no supervised
1The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.
-- 1 of 2 --
release to follow. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief
challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.
After reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its
discretion in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790
(8th Cir. 2016) (reviewing revocation sentence for abuse of discretion). The court
considered the relevant factors and did not give significant weight to an improper
factor or commit a clear error in weighing the factors. See United States v. Larison,
432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006). The sentence was also statutorily permissible.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw,
and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.