United States of America v. Jermaine Terrance Brown, also known as Bo Bo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3319
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jermaine Terrance Brown, also known as Bo Bo
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: April 22, 2025
Filed: April 25, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jermaine Brown appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 12 months in prison, with no supervised release to follow. His
1The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the substantive
reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing the revocation sentence. See United States v. Valure,
835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no indication that
the court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper
or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant
factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006)
(revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant
factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error
of judgment). Moreover, the revocation sentence is within the Guidelines range and
accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal. See United States
v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008).
Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --