United States of America v. Marlin Hudson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1066
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Marlin Hudson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: March 27, 2025
Filed: April 1, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Marlin Hudson appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 10 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave to
1The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the
sentence. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion, as Hudson admitted to violating the conditions of his release, and the
revocation sentence is within the statutory maximum. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 914, 916 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review; single violation enough
to revoke supervised release); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (maximum revocation
prison term is 2 years if underlying offense is Class C felony).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --