United States of America v. Gary Allen Kachina

23-3579Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2025

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1173
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Gary Allen Kachina
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: July 21, 2025
Filed: July 24, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Gary Kachina appeals the district court’s1 judgment revoking his supervised
release and sentencing him a prison term of 14 months, with no supervised release to
1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

follow. Having reviewed the record and Kachina’s arguments for reversal, we
conclude that a preponderance of the evidence supported the district court’s
determination that Kachina violated a special condition of his supervision, and that
the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking his supervised release. See
United States v. Perry, 2 F.4th 1146, 1148 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (standard of
review). We also conclude that Kachina’s claim of judicial bias is inadequately
supported, and that his other claims concerning his representation, government
counsel, and the manner in which the revocation hearing was conducted do not
support reversal. See United States v. Owen, 854 F.3d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 2017);
United States v. Simms, 757 F.3d 728, 731 (8th Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.