United States of America v. Benjamin Coney

23-3579Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2025

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1214
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Benjamin Coney
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas
____________
Submitted: June 30, 2025
Filed: July 3, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Benjamin Coney appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
pled guilty to sex offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has
1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), challenging the
reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion
in sentencing Coney. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.
2009) (en banc) (standard of review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d
754, 760-61 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming sentence reasonable if within United States
Sentencing Guidelines Manual range). Further, having independently reviewed the
record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.