The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1628•Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc., originally named as Conagra Brands
25-1628Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2025
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1309
___________________________
Wanda Thompson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Conagra Brands, Inc., originally named as Conagra Brands
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: September 3, 2025
Filed: September 10, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas resident Wanda Thompson appeals following the district court’s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Conagra
1The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
Brands, Inc., on her claims of race discrimination and retaliation. After careful
review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the adverse
grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court.
See Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 963 F.3d 803, 807 (8th Cir. 2020)
(reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.