United States of America v. Antonio Damher Metcalf, Sr.

24-2830Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 26, 2025

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2125
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Antonio Damher Metcalf, Sr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa
____________
Submitted: October 28, 2025
Filed: November 4, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Antonio Metcalf appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release.
His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the district court
erred in concluding he violated the conditions of his supervised release.
Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not clearly err
by finding that the government proved the violations by a preponderance of the
evidence. See United States v. Staten, 990 F.3d 631, 635 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam)
(standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw.
______________________________
1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.