The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2525•Aaron Edward Meier v. Sheriff Chris Degase
24-2525Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2025
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2293
___________________________
Aaron Edward Meier
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Sheriff Chris Degase
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: December 8, 2025
Filed: December 11, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Aaron Meier appeals following the district court’s1 adverse
grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was
1The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
arrested without probable cause. After careful consideration of the record and the
parties arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was proper because
the record showed there was probable cause for Meier’s arrest. See Said v. Mayo
Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed
de novo). We also find no error in the district court’s discovery rulings. See Vallejo
v. Amgen Inc., 903 F.3d 733, 742 (8th Cir. 2018) (district court’s discovery rulings
are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also deny Meier’s pending motions.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.