The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-3019•United States of America v. Anthony Lee Sims
23-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 30, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2066
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Anthony Lee Sims
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: January 13, 2026
Filed: January 23, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Sims appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 48 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release. His
1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
counsel has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence
and moved to withdraw.
After careful review, we conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of
discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 916 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard
of review). The revocation sentence is below the Guidelines range. See United
States v. Bevins, 848 F.3d 835, 841 (8th Cir. 2017) (“[I]t is ‘nearly inconceivable’
that a sentence is so high as to be substantively unreasonable and constitute an abuse
of discretion when the district court imposed a below-Guidelines sentence” (quoting
United States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009))). And there is no
indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant
weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th
Cir. 2006) (considerations for reasonableness of sentence).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.