United States of America v. Anthony Madison

25-2345Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 27, 2026

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1740
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Anthony Madison
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 12, 2026
Filed: February 6, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
While serving a term of supervised release, Anthony Madison was arrested
for harassment in the first degree, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.090, and nonconsensual
dissemination of private sexual images, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.110, though the state
grand jury later returned a no true bill, see Mo. Rev. Stat. § 540.260. The U.S.
Probation Office petitioned to revoke his supervised release based on the alleged

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
new law violations. The district court1 denied Madison’s request for a jury trial.
After a hearing, it found by a preponderance of the evidence that he committed both
crimes, so it revoked his supervision and imposed a revocation sentence. See 18
U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (a court may “revoke a term of supervised release . . . if the
court . . . finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a
condition of supervised release”).
Madison argues that his revocation sentence violates his Sixth Amendment
right to have a jury determine his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He acknowledges
his claim is foreclosed by United States v. Eagle Chasing, 965 F.3d 647, 650–51 (8th
Cir. 2020).
Affirmed.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.