United States of America v. Mark Anthony Gaddy

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3420
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Mark Anthony Gaddy
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: February 26, 2026
Filed: March 3, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mark Gaddy appeals after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of
firearms and ammunition. He argues the district court1 erred by denying his motion
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

to dismiss the indictment because the prosecution violated the Second Amendment,
both facially and as applied to him. Upon careful review, we conclude that the
district court properly denied the motion, as Gaddy’s argument is foreclosed by our
precedent. See United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125, 1129 (8th Cir. 2024),
cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2708 (2025); see also United States v. Harris-Franklin, 146
F.4th 631, 637 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2025); United States v. Cameron, 99 F.4th 432, 435-36
(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 314 (2024). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --