United States of America v. Roy William Crangle

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2818
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Roy William Crangle
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: April 6, 2026
Filed: April 9, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Roy Crangle appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and
sentenced him to 8 months in prison followed by 12 months of supervised release.
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

Crangle challenges the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised release and
the revocation sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914-18 (8th Cir. 2009)
(standard of review); see also United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir.
2008) (district court need not make specific findings on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors;
all that is generally required to satisfy appellate court is evidence that court was aware
of relevant factors); and the sentence was within the advisory Guidelines range, and
below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (maximum revocation prison
term is 2 years if underlying offense is Class C felony); Perkins, 526 F.3d at 1110
(revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded presumption of
reasonableness on appeal). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --