The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1338•United States of America v. Matthew Noel Hutchings
25-1338Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 29, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2032
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Matthew Noel Hutchings
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: April 30, 2026
Filed: May 5, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Hutchings appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he
pled guilty to a tax offense. He challenges his sentence as substantively
unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not impose a
substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455,
461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (abuse of discretion review); see also United States v.
Mangum, 625 F.3d 466, 469-70 (8th Cir. 2010) (upward variance is reasonable where
court makes individualized assessment based on facts presented). Accordingly, we
affirm.
______________________________
1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.