The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1338•Elisa Lopez-Vasquez v. Pamela Bondi
25-1338Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 29, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3073
___________________________
Ashley M. Huber
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
____________
Submitted: May 26, 2026
Filed: May 29, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ashley Huber appeals after the tax court1 sustained the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue’s calculation of her tax deficiency and penalty, following a trial in
her action challenging a notice of deficiency. Upon careful review, we conclude the
1The Honorable Ronald L. Buch, United States Tax Court Judge.
-- 1 of 2 --
tax court did not err in sustaining the notice of deficiency, including the substantial-
understatement penalty assessed against Huber. See Campbell v. Comm’r, 164 F.3d
1140, 1142 (8th Cir. 1999) (tax court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error
and its legal conclusions are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.