The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-3255•John L. Corrigan, Jr. v. The County of Scott
24-3255Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3459
___________________________
John L. Corrigan, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
The County of Scott
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 22, 2026
Filed: June 24, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
John Corrigan Jr. appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review of the record and the parties’
arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Sutter & Gillham PLLC v. Henry,
146 F.4th 699, 702-04 (8th Cir. 2025).
______________________________
1The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.