The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-3142•United States of America v. Brandon Jones
24-3142Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2258
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Brandon Jones
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: July 13, 2026
Filed: July 16, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Brandon Jones appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pled
guilty to drug offenses. He challenges a condition of supervised release related to sex
offender registration, arguing that he has never been convicted of a sex offense. He
also argues his sentence is substantively unreasonable.
-- 1 of 2 --
The government concedes that imposition of the condition of supervised
release was erroneous. In light of that concession, we vacate the challenged
condition. As to Jones’s challenge to the length of his sentence, we conclude the
district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States
v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (abuse of discretion review).
We vacate imposition of the challenged condition and remand with directions
that the judgment be amended to remove the condition. We affirm the sentence in all
other respects.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.