The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-3142•United States of America v. Fame Imari Cobbs, also known as Fred
24-3142Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2026
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3462
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Fame Imari Cobbs, also known as Fred
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
___________________________
No. 25-3463
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Fame Imari Cobbs, also known as Fred
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeals from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Southern
____________
-- 1 of 3 --
Submitted: July 28, 2026
Filed: July 31, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and JUSTIN D. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Fame Cobbs appeals the sentences the district
court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to drug, money laundering, and assault
offenses pursuant to written plea agreements containing appeal waivers. His counsel
has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentences and
arguing the appeal waivers should not be enforced.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waivers are valid, applicable,
and enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010)
(reviewing de novo validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v.
Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be
enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily
entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in
miscarriage of justice).
We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the
1The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.
-2-
-- 2 of 3 --
appeal waivers. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals and grant counsel leave to
withdraw.
______________________________
-3-
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.