United States of America v. Turner Heinbaugh

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-2729
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Turner Heinbaugh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Western
____________
Submitted: July 14, 2026
Filed: August 6, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, L.R. SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Turner Heinbaugh appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit money laundering pursuant to a plea
1The Honorable Camela C. Theeler, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.

-- 1 of 2 --

agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the
sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,
and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d
702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.
2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v.
Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside
the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw,
and dismiss the appeal.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --